{"id":4016,"date":"2014-12-19T07:57:12","date_gmt":"2014-12-19T15:57:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.esri.com\/about\/newsroom\/insider\/?p=4016"},"modified":"2014-12-19T07:57:12","modified_gmt":"2014-12-19T15:57:12","slug":"creating-a-sustainable-gis","status":"publish","type":"insider","link":"https:\/\/www.esri.com\/about\/newsroom\/insider\/creating-a-sustainable-gis","title":{"rendered":"Creating a Sustainable GIS"},"content":{"rendered":"

A COTS-based approach insures your applications will stand the test of time.<\/em><\/strong>
\n[Note: This is latest post in our series about <\/em>Managing GIS<\/em><\/a>.]<\/em>
\n <\/strong>
\n\u201cGovernment agency leaders recognize that pre-recession business models are not sustainable, and are willing to pursue radical service changes by making targeted IT investments.\u201d
\n\u2013Gartner<\/a>, Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for Smart Government, 2013<\/em><\/a>
\nThis quote from Gartner is one I use frequently, because I think it says a great deal about our situation in the GIS<\/a> industry today. The game plan we used in the late 2000s is no longer sustainable. Even if GIS professionals don\u2019t immediately recognize it, IT and agency directors do, and they are ready to spend money on it. In this installment of our Managing GIS<\/a> series, we\u2019ll take a look at why that is and how it impacts today\u2019s GIS professionals when it comes to applications.
\n
\nSure, We Can Code That<\/strong>
\nWith the advent of ArcGIS for Server<\/a> in the last decade, many organizations looked to hire developers to create custom applications. At first, this was a sound strategy. ArcGIS for Server was new and there weren\u2019t many templates available. So, it made sense to create applications where a workflow was defined. Even when there were Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS<\/a>) applications out there for workflows like permitting or work order management, many organizations declined those for various reasons. Some were convinced their workflows were so unique that they weren\u2019t a perfect fit for the app. Some believed, since they had developers in-house, that building it themselves meant they were getting it \u201cfor free.\u201d But even with full-time developers, many organizations were overwhelmed trying to support existing apps while upgrading older apps to the latest version of the software. Unable to keep up with these demands, many found themselves lagging one or two versions behind the latest functionality, which ultimately held back the organization as a whole.
\nThen, the recession hit. Many organizations had to drop some or all of their developers, and those that were already struggling to keep their heads above water found their ability to continue to sustain an internal suite of custom applications all but eliminated.
\n
\nDebunking Some Myths about Applications<\/strong>
\nHere was one of the core problems. Too many IT departments and agency directors were convinced their workflows were special<\/em>\u2026that there was no way a COTS application could meet their needs. Another important quote from the same Gartner report<\/a> discussing business process management:
\n\u201cIn the belief that every agency or government program business process is unique, program managers have historically favored the development of highly customized IT solutions over commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) products or cloud-based business services. More often than not, the presumed uniqueness of a business process is overstated.\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/strong>
\nThe other problem was that the total cost of ownership wasn\u2019t always factored in to the business decision to deploy a customized application. If you\u2019re an IT Director reading this, you probably laughed a little when I mentioned that some organizations thought developing an app in-house meant they were getting it for free. We all know that\u2019s clearly not the case. Maintaining and supporting an application in-house can take an inordinate and unsustainable amount of resources, and many organizations have learned the hard way that just because they can<\/em><\/strong> code a customized app doesn\u2019t mean they should<\/em><\/strong>.
\nThe old 80-20 rule was that if you had a COTS app that accomplished 80% of your workflow, you customized the other 20% to meet your workflow needs. The new 80-20 rule states that now you change the 20% of your workflow<\/em> to meet the functionality of the COTS app, because even though it can cause a temporary disruption, doing so is much less costly in the long run than coding and maintaining the customization.
\n
\nChanging Technology, Changing Expectations<\/strong>
\nTake a minute to look at the apps on your smart phone. On mine, I have Pandora<\/a> and TripCase<\/a>. One plays music. One gives me details about my travel schedule. Notice a pattern? These respective apps do one thing. Each one addresses a single need or workflow. That\u2019s it.
\nFor better or worse, your executives and users have been \u201ctrained\u201d to expect that from their applications. Creating the do-everything app with 30 layers and a dozen buttons worked well eight years ago. But it doesn\u2019t work anymore. Your solutions have to be focused. So this means that instead of deploying a few general applications, your customers are expecting many focused applications.
\n
\nSupporting a Sustainable Strategy<\/strong>
\nOver the last several years, Esri has created dozens of focused, configurable, fully-supported COTS solutions and deployed them on our Solutions page. There are ArcGIS suites for Local<\/a> and State Government<\/a>, Emergency Management<\/a>, Utilities<\/a>, Telecommunications<\/a>, and more. Each suite addresses a set of verticals, such as Health, Land Records, Economic Development, Planning, Natural Resources, etc.
\n\"\"
\nThese applications are free. They\u2019re fully documented and supported by Esri Technical Support<\/a>. You can even download the code for each of these apps.
\nIf you\u2019re using ArcGIS Online<\/a>, you\u2019re probably already aware of the numerous free applications<\/a> in which you can plug your web maps to perform tasks like editing in the field, creating elevation profiles, geo-enabling spreadsheets, or monitoring social media. Story Maps<\/a> are an increasingly popular way to turn ArcGIS Online web maps into attractive, interactive applications. Again, these require no coding to implement. <\/ins>
\n\"\"
\nA diverse group of Esri partners are also creating low-cost and free COTS solutions. Check them out in the ArcGIS Marketplace<\/a>.
\nUndertaking and migrating to a COTS-based approach may seem a little overwhelming at first. A productive first step would be to look at your existing customized applications. What workflows do they specifically address? Are they still applicable? Compare them to what\u2019s available for free as a COTS app, and put together a timeline for migrating. Start small and work your way up to the more complicated applications. You\u2019ll likely find there are several low-hanging fruits\u2026some quick wins\u2026that you can easily grab. Many organizations are already doing this with great success.
\n
\nAnd Finally\u2026<\/strong>
\nNo one is saying that you should never customize an application ever again. It\u2019s reasonable to think there may come a time when that\u2019s the most feasible path, and choosing to create a customized app is a long-term business decision that should be made by an executive. But, it shouldn\u2019t be your first instinct. Your first instinct should be: Configure first. Customize only when necessary.<\/strong>
\n

\"\"<\/a>
The City of Naples, Florida<\/a> embraces a sustainable COTS-based approach to applications.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nEmbracing a COTS-based approach is not something specific to GIS. It\u2019s a trend in IT as a whole, as Gartner has addressed many times. The game plan we had seven or eight years ago was a good one for the time, but evidence has shown it\u2019s no longer sustainable. Internal IT resources have generally decreased, technology has evolved, and your users\u2019 expectations have changed. Use these (free) resources at your disposal to cut costs, reduce risk, increase efficiency, improve decision making, and show others the real value of the GIS in your organization.<\/p>\n

—–<\/p>\n

Additional Resources <\/strong><\/p>\n