CTM’s solution was to break the transition down into phases that each lasted about a year. The idea was to show people that although the move to ArcGIS Pro was a necessity, it was also a welcome change.
“The thing that always gets people is the fear of something not being supported in the future,” Rudin said. “We kind of had to angle it to emphasize what’s not going to be in ArcMap versus what is in [ArcGIS] Pro.”
Communication was key throughout the process. A Geospatial Information Management Board held regular meetings with a consortium of GIS analysts from across city government. Dubbed the SPOCS (“single points of contact”), the group communicated concerns that they or their colleagues were having. SPOCs would also bring back useful information that would facilitate the shift and get people excited about the migration from a legacy software to a more modern geospatial platform.
Some GIS users were eager to make the switch. In that first year, at least six city agencies, including the parks, fire, and police departments, transitioned to ArcGIS Pro. Other agencies required a little hand-holding, at least at first. CTM had access to information regarding individual usage, so they could see which agencies were still digging into the GIS Data Mart. This allowed CTM to better understand the situation each SPOC was dealing with.
Fears that ArcGIS Pro would be difficult to learn quickly dissipated when reluctant users received offers of assistance and opportunities to learn the new software. And through it all, the lines of communication were wide open. CTM even began publishing a regular newsletter to keep people aware of the ongoing migration. They made sure to halt any new installations, and that all new employees began with ArcGIS Pro.
CTM’s participation in the Esri Advantage Program was productive, as well. Access to the program’s strategic training allowed the agency to offer several “Migrating to Pro” instructor-led classes during the migration. An Esri solution engineer was easily reachable to answer questions regarding how to accomplish the same tasks in ArcGIS Pro that people were accustomed to doing in ArcMap. Individual departments with custom ArcMap extensions used Learning and Service Credits through the program to consult with Esri Professional Services to determine individual migration paths for their tools. CTM’s technical advisor helped connect them with teams within Esri that could answer niche questions and coordinate small activities between Austin city government offices and Esri technical resources.