Lacking a legislative mandate that would afford reliable funding, the Georgia Geologic Survey was abolished in 2004 after serving the state for 168 years. Because state geologic surveys provide scientific, economic, and educational functions, they are generally considered a fundamental element of state government. Recently, samples collected by a state geologic survey were used to verify mineral deposits for commercial mining operations, while work by the survey in another state precipitated an investigation into a natural gas seepage through fractured bedrock that resulted in a series of dangerous explosions.
When the Georgia Geologic Survey was abolished, its extensive collection of minerals, core samples, fossils, geologic maps, historical documents, and ongoing research was widely dispersed throughout the state. Some of the materials were relocated to museums, schools, and storage facilities. However, a significant portion was either lost or discarded due to a lack of space.
“The loss of Georgia’s Geologic Survey has created a real gap in the knowledge about the geology of our state,” said Katayoun Mobasher, an associate professor of geology at the University of North Georgia’s Institute for Environmental & Spatial Analysis.
To try to narrow this gap, Mobasher began digitizing both old and new information about the state’s geology in a geodatabase. But she felt that she could do more to share this information widely and fill the increasing fissures of knowledge among geologists, geoscientists, and geology educators and students.
“I wanted to create a multimedia publication,” said Mobasher. “I found that the Esri Story Maps format works really well.”
And so, the interactive Geology of Georgia field guide was born.
A Digital Field Guide
Having gaping holes in knowledge about geology—and lacking a central organization through which this information flows—affects economic and social development, as well as education.
“Geology is dynamic,” said Mobasher. “The processes that took place in the past to form our geology are still happening today, which provides us with important insight into our geologic, and potentially economic, future—particularly for those natural resources that are exploited commercially, such as crude oil, natural gas, and a variety of minerals. In addition, because state geologic surveys regularly publish information that can be used by geoscience researchers and educators, there was a lack of current information available that I could use in my geology classes”—especially for trips to the field, which are an important component of all geology classes.
The 2013 publication of Roadside Geology of Georgia, by Dr. Pamela Gore and Dr. William Witherspoon, was welcomed by the geologic community, since it provided much-needed updates about Georgia’s geology. But it was only available in print.
“The book does provide excellent material that I have used in my classes,” said Mobasher. “But as a GIS professional, I began thinking about the advantages of merging the information contained in the book and developing a field guide that could be published digitally.”
Mobasher wanted her students to be able to use their smartphones and tablets to access the guide in the field. She thought a field guide could also include links to additional information about each location. And she wanted to be able to make updates more quickly and foster greater collaboration.
In 2014, Mobasher began developing a geodatabase by field verifying and digitizing the site information contained in the Roadside Geology of Georgia, as well as other field information about Georgia outcrops. She also examined the voluminous geologic reports, papers, and data related to the state’s geology. Her plan was to use this geodatabase to produce her digital field guide.
“At present, the geodatabase contains more than 300 field-verified collection points with descriptions of the sites and other geologic information,” said Mobasher. “Sixteen of those are among the most significant geologic locations in Georgia, and I have enhanced their descriptions with a range of other information, which has been included in the initial release of the guide. Often, there are professional controversies about the age or composition of a particular outcrop, and I think [it] is important to include the information that led to the final conclusion in the field guide, as it provides needed perspective.”
Because Mobasher uses various ArcGIS software products to collect and maintain the geodatabase, she first attempted to produce a field guide with ArcGIS Online. But it didn’t provide the visual context she was looking for. So she turned to Esri Story Maps apps.
“I began [with a prototype of] the layout and included photos of the geologic outcrops and rock samples, petrographic thin section images, geologic sketches, and related videos,” she said. “The Geology of Georgia field guide was the result of this publishing effort, and it was released during the summer of 2017.”
Getting Help from the Community
Development of the Geology of Georgia field guide is an ongoing process. As researchers complete information about geologic sites around Georgia, Mobasher adds it to the guide. And because the guide is interactive, it provides directions on how to get to each site through Survey123 for ArcGIS or Collector for ArcGIS.
Both professional and amateur geologists use the guide, as do geology students in both undergraduate and graduate classes. To help everyone get the most out of the field guide and further collective knowledge about Georgia’s geology, Mobasher has written challenging questions and included references from other geologists concerning the outcrops to promote speculation and analysis about them based on existing evidence.
But building a geologic geodatabase for the entire state of Georgia is a complex and time-consuming project. To maintain its momentum, Mobasher is enlisting the help of the geologic community.
“Contributors to the database include students in geology courses that use the exercises as part of their final projects, research assistants, current and retired geologists, and geology department faculty members,” she said. “Contributors can download the Collector for ArcGIS app and/or Survey123 to their smartphones or tablets and then go out into the field to collect geologic data. I have designed a template-based form so that the data can be easily entered into the database. I am actually maintaining two databases for this project—one for my students, which I check very carefully for accuracy, and one for professional geologists.”
Infusing the New with the Old
One important aspect of the project is preserving the handwritten notes and sketches of retired geologists and geoscientists.
“Their personal collections of geologic data provide a unique contribution to rebuilding the Georgia geodatabase in a digital format,” said Mobasher. “This is a special part of the project for me. I retype some of the information I receive, while other notes and drawings are scanned for use in the field guide.”
Because the geology of Georgia is complex, there are sometimes different interpretations of outcrop formations.
“The information provided by the more experienced geologists stimulates thought and dialog among the new generation of geologists,” said Mobasher. “The availability of the previous observations by experienced geologists in the easily understandable story map format helps motivate discussion and new hypotheses.”
Witherspoon, who is president of the Georgia Geological Society, and Dr. Timothy LaTour, professor emeritus at Georgia State University, are two of several geologists who have given Mobasher invaluable material. When LaTour gave her all his personal geology field notes, he said, “This new era of technology provides great opportunities in making geologic information available to many more people with the potentiality of producing new discoveries.”