ArcGIS Blog

3D Visualization & Analytics

ArcGIS Online

Securing the Invisible: Why digital twin security starts with data governance.

By Holger Lipke and Andreas Lippold

Digital twins: powerful, precise – and secure

As cities and industries embrace digital transformation, digital twins have emerged as powerful tools for modeling, monitoring, and optimizing real-world systems. These highly accurate, survey-grade 3D representations are more than just visualizations—they are operational models, tightly linked to real-time systems and designed to drive decisions and actions. 

However, with this power comes vulnerability and responsibility. The true risk doesn’t lie in the digital twin itself, but in the vast streams of data that fuel it. From infrastructure schematics to live sensor feeds, this data can expose critical systems to cyber threats, privacy breaches, and misuse if not properly secured.

Digital twins can be built on geospatial data – often collected at survey-grade accuracy—and can include sensitive details about infrastructure, utilities, and operations. This level of precision, while essential for solving real-world problems, also introduces security vulnerabilities if organizations do not properly manage the data.  The threat lies in  accessibility, editability, and shareability of that data – especially when it includes critical infrastructure or private operational systems. 

When accuracy becomes a liability 

The value of a digital twin lies in its accuracy and detail. But that same fidelity can expose: 

  • Building schematics and access points 
  • Underground utilities and traffic control systems 
  • Operational workflows and emergency response plans 

Unauthorized users accessing this information can pose operational, physical, and cybersecurity risks. 

Balancing openness with smart access control 

At Esri, we’ve long championed open data. Through platforms like the Living Atlas, we make non-sensitive geospatial data freely available – not just to customers, but to the public through apps like ArcGIS Earth. This openness empowers users to innovate, enhances transparency, and enables communities to make better decisions.

Rather than weakening or abandoning openness, we view this as an opportunity to make access smarter. Esri’s ArcGIS platform provides a granular, role-based approach to data governance that ensures digital twins remain secure while delivering flexibility and value. With ArcGIS, organizations can: 

  • Classify data by sensitivity 
  • Control access by user roles 
  • Track and audit data usage 
  • Secure APIs for controlled sharing 
  • Adhere to standards like ISO 27000 and FedRAMP 

This means that organizations can limit sensitive data – such as the interior of buildings or utility networks – to authorized professionals, such as emergency services or utility operators. At the same time, non-sensitive data that is valuable to the public remains open and available. The result is a balanced model: open where it creates opportunities, protected where it matters most. 

Role-based permissions with ArcGIS user types 

The new ArcGIS User Types allow organizations to tailor access and editing rights based on specific roles: 

  • Viewers: Read-only access for policymakers or the public 
  • Contributors: Limited editing for municipal departments or service providers 
  • Field Workers: Mobile access to task-specific data 
  • Creators: Build maps and dashboards within access limits 
  • GIS Professionals: Full access to advanced tools, within assigned domains 

Furthermore, combined with group- and layer-based access controls, this enables even finer-grained management. Users see exactly what they need for their tasks – no more, no less. This supports a modern security strategy that balances openness with control – a crucial step toward resilient, trustworthy digital twins. 

Security beyond access: managing downstream use 

Security doesn’t end at access; it extends to how organizations use, share, and interpret data. Organizations must ensure that data is used only for its intended purpose; third-party integrations are secure, and exports and visualizations are sanitized. This is especially important when public datasets are combined with private, sensitive data in a digital twin. Organizations must design the twin to be secure, with flexible controls that evolve as new users and use cases emerge. 

Purpose-built for real-world impact 

Digital twins are purpose-built to solve real problems, from climate resilience to emergency response. Their power comes from the data they integrate, which often spans multiple departments, domains, and disciplines.  

Therefore, organizations must embed security from the start. A digital twin should be interoperable across systems, contextual to the problem it solves, and controlled in how data is accessed and used.  

This approach ensures that digital twins remain resilient, trustworthy, and adaptable. 

Secure the data, empower the twin 

Ultimately, organizations must balance openness and security in the future of digital twins. With the right data governance strategy, powered by ArcGIS, organizations can protect sensitive infrastructure, enable innovation through open data, and build trust with citizens and stakeholders.

Let’s build digital twins that are not only smart and open – but also secure and resilient. 

Explore what’s possible 

👉 Discover how Esri’s proven ArcGIS technology delivers comprehensive capabilities and multiple deployment options for architecting a secure digital twin system.

Share this article

One response to “Securing the Invisible: Why digital twin security starts with data governance.”

  1. 1. Where Security Really Starts

    The article stresses a critical truth: “The true risk doesn’t lie in the digital twin itself, but in the vast streams of data that fuel it.”

    How do we balance the operational needs of digital twins with the risks of overexposing sensitive infrastructure data?

    2. When Accuracy Becomes a Risk

    High-resolution 3D data, real-time sensors, and operational workflows make digital twins incredibly useful—but also highly vulnerable.

    Are current GIS teams sufficiently trained to assess and classify digital twin data based on sensitivity?

    3. Esri’s Role-Based Access Approach

    The article introduces granular user types (Viewers, Field Workers, Creators, etc.) in ArcGIS to govern access.

    Has anyone implemented role-based access in ArcGIS for a digital twin project? What were the practical challenges?

    4. Open Data ≠ Uncontrolled Access

    Esri highlights that open data can still be secure if governed well.

    In your opinion, where should we draw the line between “open for innovation” and “closed for protection”?

    5. Beyond Access: Securing Use and Interpretation

    The article wisely points out that “security doesn’t end at access.” Data must also be governed in terms of how it’s used, combined, and visualized.

    What are some best practices for ensuring downstream uses of sensitive data remain secure—especially in public-private digital twin collaborations?

    This article is a great reminder that digital twin success hinges not just on technology—but on smart, embedded data governance. As someone working with geospatial data and critical infrastructure, I’ve seen firsthand how precision can turn into vulnerability if not managed carefully. Esri’s emphasis on role-based access, sensitivity classification, and auditing provides a strong framework. We should treat governance as a design principle, not just a compliance checklist. #DigitalTwins #Esri #DataSecurity #GIS #SmartCities

Leave a Reply